Technical Case Study
From: Aga Khan University (Aga Khan Health Services)
Authors: Karim Ashraf, Miriam Kugele, Malik Ahmed
Approach
This case study presents an approach to engage healthcare suppliers for sustainability in a low and middle-resource context. Key strategies adopted in the Aga Khan Development Network include:
- Hybrid Emissions Accounting: Combined top-down (EE-MRIO) and bottom-up (supplier carbon intensity) data enabled comprehensive emissions tracking.
- Supply chain focus: Emissions assessments showed that over 70% of emissions stem from the supply chain, with key hotspots in pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, lab consumables, and medical/surgical equipment.
- Gap analysis: Recognized disparities between international suppliers with sustainability goals versus LMIC manufacturers with less knowledge and only few starting on sustainability actions.
- Encouragement over Enforcement: Chose to incentivize rather than mandate sustainability actions among suppliers to avoid disadvantaging LMIC manufacturers.
- Capacity building: Aimed to understand and address suppliers’ knowledge, capacity, and needs regarding sustainability and net zero goals.
- Innovation and flexibility: Developed a lean, adaptable approach that can be updated regularly as new data emerges.
Why take action?
The healthcare sector is responsible for around 5% of global emissions1 and the bulk stems from supply chains2,3. At healthcare facility level, data of the Aga Khan University (AKU) and of the Aga Khan Health Services (AKHS), corroborates this finding: over 70% of emissions were found to arise from supply chains of its operating hospitals and health systems in nine low and middle income countries (LMICs) in South and Central Asia, as well as East Africa. It is therefore now understood as essential that all stakeholders across the supply chain reduce their emissions, in order to deliver low carbon healthcare. This requires ambitious and consistent goals, collaboration, capacity building, and accountability.
The intervention by Aga Khan University (AKU) aims to support manufacturers in LMICs to implement sustainability actions, specifically to reduce their emissions, while at the same time reviewing our purchasing practices to influence change. This initiative is part of AKDN’s broader commitment to achieving operational net zero emissions by 2030, focusing on the most vulnerable, and shifting towards more sustainable procurement by engaging and supporting suppliers.
Key messages
Benefits of the Intervention:
- Decrease in GHG emissions: By encouraging suppliers to adopt sustainable practices, AKU aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relating to its own operations as well as across the health system by enabling more sustainable products to be available for others.
- Enhanced climate resilience: Sustainable practices help build resilience against climate-related disruptions, ensuring continuous and reliable healthcare services. This is particularly relevant for LMICs, which are among the most vulnerable to climate change impacts.
- Resilient supply chains: By collaborating closely with suppliers, trust relationships can be improved, and product alternatives can be identified to improve redundancy.
- Cost savings: Sustainable procurement can lead to cost savings through improved efficiency and reduced waste
Co-Benefits of the Intervention:
- Improved health outcomes: Reducing emissions and promoting sustainability can lead to better air quality and overall health outcomes for the community.
- Quality of care: Sustainable practices can enhance the quality of care by ensuring a reliable supply of essential medical products.
- Innovation and capacity: Knowledge on climate change and climate action can be improved and shared more widely, and innovations can be encouraged in the multi-stakeholder collaboration.
- Economic benefits: Supporting local suppliers and manufacturers can boost the local economy and create jobs, fostering economic resilience.
Overall:
- Targeted actions in the supply chain can lead to substantial reductions in GHG emissions.
- Building the capacity of local manufacturers to adopt sustainable practices is crucial for long-term sustainability and resilience.
- Sustainable procurement practices not only reduce emissions but also improve health outcomes and support local economies.
- The hybrid emissions accounting approach is a scalable model that can be adapted and lead to iterative learning as new data emerges.
How to get started
The initiative was launched with the overarching goal of supporting manufacturers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) to adopt sustainability practices, particularly aimed at reducing emissions to combat global climate change. LMICs are disproportionately affected by climate change, making them prime beneficiaries of mitigation efforts. This context underscored the urgency and importance of implementing climate resilience and low-carbon sustainability interventions.
The following sections elaborate on the strategies and implementation taken by AKU since 2021, and the key learning from each.
Key learning: Accounting of operational and supply chain emissions to focus action
Undertaking comprehensive annual emissions accounting for both operations and supply chains is crucial for identifying hotspots to target action and engagement and tracking progress. Internal expertise is vital for accurate data collection. Staff in each AKU and AKHS country of operation have been calculating supply chain emissions annually since 2020, which has provided a clear baseline and identified key focus areas. For our operations, the procurement emissions hotspots include pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, lab consumables, and medical/surgical equipment, while construction materials have also been found to be important in our expanding operations, though more varied across time. Data in these hotpots has further been segmented by international suppliers, distributors, and LMIC based manufacturers, which has allowed us to focus engagement where it will be most targeted and useful.
More information on the AKDN Carbon Management Tool and its innovative approach of combined top-down (EE-MRIO) and bottom-up (supplier carbon intensity) procurement emissions accounting can be found here.
Key learning: Developing emissions reduction targets for consistent direction and ambition
Ambitious targets can drive substantial progress, and shared responsibility between buyers and manufacturers fosters collaboration and accountability. Our metrics include:
- spending with companies that monitor their emissions,
- spending with companies that have science-based net zero targets for their operations;
- spending with companies that have science-based net zero targets for their full value chain.
These targets are aligned with the NHS, to ensure global consistency, while maintaining locally-appropriate approaches. High targets, such as achieving 90% of our spending with companies who monitor their emissions by 2025, have driven significant engagement and action, even in challenging environments, like Afghanistan.
Key learning: Communicating with suppliers early on
Clear communication of goals are essential for supplier alignment, and early engagement helps set expectations. In early 2022, we communicated to more than 5000 of our suppliers about our own net zero targets for operations and engagement targets for procurement, to ensure suppliers were aware of AKU’s sustainability goals. This transparency encouraged suppliers to reach out and share their own sustainability actions, as well as to reach out and request support to get started.
More recently, we have included a short paragraph related to our procurement engagement targets and commitment to work on sustainability together in all tenders as well as requests for proposals and quotes (RFPs and RFQs). The goal is to ensure that sustainability is built into communication and conversation from the outset.
Key learning: Training internal procurement staff
Training builds internal capacity and expertise, and educated staff who feel they share ownership can better support sustainability goals. Training sessions were tailored to local knowledge baselines and rolled out since 2021 to become an annual activity to educate procurement staff on relevant terminology, purposes, and approaches and to co-design the next steps and share achievements.
Key learning: Supplier surveys for understanding starting points
We designed an online survey in late 2022 that included questions on emissions, energy, water, and packaging, to gather supplier data on emissions accounting and sustainability measures. Nearly 400 manufacturers responded, which provided valuable insights for further engagement. Importantly, the survey questions included links to informative resources, thereby building knowledge of the suppliers as they filled out the questionnaire. An associated learning for us and the companies was that most LMIC manufacturers had no focal person on sustainability (yet), which compounded data collection but prompted some companies to designate such roles.
Key learning: Sustainability workshops to foster shared ownership
Based on the learnings from the survey as well as bilateral conversations with suppliers, we organized our first half-day workshop in March 2023 with Pakistan-based manufacturers to share experiences and discuss needs and incentives, followed by another workshop in October 2023, and a workshop in Kenya in May 2023. These engagements focused on who should take sustainability action, and quick wins from carbon accounting. Group discussions fostered a community around shared sustainability goals and challenges, and facilitated knowledge exchange. The key learnings from the survey and workshops are:
- Vast majority of LMIC manufacturers want to progress on sustainability work.
- Few manufacturers know where to start.
- The majority of the manufacturers don’t know there is a business case.
- There is a huge need for skilled capacity.
- There is a need for alignment, at least within the sector, or where possible with public procurement, and clarity on expectations.
- There is a need to ensure equal access and opportunity for LMIC-based suppliers.
Key learning: Designing step-by-step pathways and incentives
Given all the above learnings, we developed pathways of supplier expectations over time, readying the suppliers to become compliant with the NHS pathway. This creates alignment and maintains ambition while being able to get LMIC-based manufacturers started on the journey with smaller steps, and at low cost. For example, we encourage and train companies to start their Scope 1 and 2 carbon accounting, and then to develop medium-term targets, before moving to public disclosure, etc. Alongside, incentives such as recognition letters or events are being designed to support supplier sustainability journeys.
The pathway is in finalisation and will become available by end 2024.
Tracking progress
AKU’s operational net zero commitment is unique among healthcare institutions and universities in the countries where we operate, and our deep engagement with suppliers has shown important lessons. AKU is innovating and leading by example to showcase what can and needs to be done for climate mitigation, even in LMICs where the focus (in policy as well as public discourse) otherwise tends to be on climate adaptation. This is crucial because, through our supplier engagement, we can create a ripple effect that extends well beyond our own operations.
We measure progress through both annual emissions accounting and a supplier survey, which allow us to monitor changes made by our suppliers over time. For instance, our emissions accounting revealed that in 2021, 28% of our spend was with suppliers who had operational net zero targets, which increased to 34% in 2022 and 42% in 2023 (partly also due to better data availability). Additionally, the sustainability survey is now a requirement in supplier onboarding, raising awareness among new suppliers.
We support our suppliers in LMICs in various ways, including sharing and training on our AKDN Carbon Management Tool and conducting supplier workshops. Immediate actions include identifying top local manufacturers for in-person carbon accounting training and updating AKU procurement webpages with sustainability maturity levels. An annual survey assesses manufacturers’ progress, with acknowledgment letters serving as incentives, are about to the rolled out.
Overall learning from our supplier engagement to date indicates that LMIC-based companies are eager for knowledge, as they are aware of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) principles, feel the pressure of rising energy costs, and understand the need for sustainability action in order to export their goods. However, many do not know where to start, which is a gap we aim to address while aligning criteria and standards, in order to keep high ambition towards sustainable health systems.
In practice
The initiative has evolved as we learn what is needed and what is possible. Internal staff have shown a keen interest in climate, environment, and sustainability topics, with some exploring opportunities for formal training and degrees by recognizing that sustainability skills are among the most sought-after today 66.
Continued reflections from our core team, including the sustainability lead and procurement leads, have been the driving force behind this initiative. Support from leadership and openness to exploring different ways forward, as well as considering changes in procurement practices, have been critical to the initiative's success and progress.
Other stakeholders within the healthcare sector have also started to show interest. For example, some medical practitioners are considering environmental aspects such as packaging and suggesting potential switches from single-use to multi-use items.
As elaborated above, we have integrated several changes into routine procurement practices, such as mandatory surveys, additions to standard text for tenders and requests for proposals/quotes, annual tracking of goals and metrics, regular research that feeds into tracking, regular staff trainings, and others.
We share our learnings on global networks to stimulate learning and uptake, showcasing that LMICs can be innovators and accelerate climate ambition, rather than just being recipients of 'best practices’.
Global sharing and coordination ensure a network of actors can be built, enabling consistency in expectations from companies. This is crucial given the numerous GHG accounting tools, ESG reporting frameworks, and green certifications. Therefore, we particularly focus on science-based net zero targets in line with the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi)7, as it is the most ambitious, rigorous, and transparent process.
More information
For more information, please contact Miriam Kugele (Director, Office of Environment and Sustainability, Aga Khan University) at miriam.kugele@aku.edu.
References
- Kluge H, Forman R, Muscat NA, Berdzuli N, Mossialos E. Environmental sustainability of health systems: time to act. Lancet [Internet]. 2023;401(10388):1552–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00730-4
- Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, Boyd R, Hamilton I, Oreszczyn T, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health [Internet]. 2021;5(2):e84–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0
- Rodríguez-Jiménez L, Romero-Martín M, Spruell T, Steley Z, Gómez-Salgado J. The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2023;79(8):2830–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.15671
- Lesser R, Kennedy, Marjolein DC, Lyle E, Shah S, Bamberger S, et al. Put Talent at the Top of the Sustainability Agenda. BCG [Internet]. 2023 Jan 11; Available from: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/prioritize-talent-within-sustainability-agenda